Continuing on from yesterday’s post, which featured the first half of an article on mail and Collinge’s axles, as published in the December 1834 issue of the London Mechanics’ Magazine:
.
The next kind of axle, and the best which has been hitherto invented as applicable to ordinary wheels, is that known under the name of “Collinge’s Patent.” The original specification was, I believe, “a cylinder secured between two cones.” But an axle on such a principle would not run smoothly; it would jar violently in the end play against the shoulder cone, and consequently the axles are never made so. The collar at the shoulder, against which the face of the wheel-box runs, is made very broad, flat, firm, and solid, and is, moreover, provided with an external rim or guard, which covers the end of the box, and excludes dirt and water. Close to the face of the box there is a reservoir of oil, and between the box and the collar there is a washer of solid leather. The centre of the arm is slightly turned down in the lathe, below the surface, to afford a lodgement for oil. The front of the arm beyond the box is turned down about a quarter of an inch, and a flat side filed on it. Upon this a small collar of gun-metal slides, the outer side of which projects in a conical form against the front end of the box, which is formed into a similar shape to receive it. Through this gunmetal collar a small hole is pierced to allow the passage of oil. It is thus evident, that when the wheel is in motion, owing to the flat side, the coned collar has no lateral motion, though it can slide along the arm, and regulate the play of the wheel. This collar is turned in the lathe when fixed on the arm, consequently it must fit accurately the end of the box, which is ground on to the arm. To adjust this collar to its place, and keep it firm there, two nuts of gun-metal, with right and left hand threads, one of smaller size than the other, are affixed. In adjusting, the first nut is screwed to the proper place, and then the second is screwed tight against it, one nut wedging the other. As a further security, a spring linch-pin is driven into the end of the arm beyond the nuts. Over the whole a large cap of gun-metal is screwed against the end of the box, with a washer of thin leather. This cap contains oil in its lower circumference, reaching to the horizontal level of the leakage point at the shoulder. The cap may be entirely filled, if it be wished, but it is useless, because the action of the wheel in turning would pump it away and waste it very rapidly. If it be wished to increase the quantity of the oil, the proper plan is to increase the circumference of the cap. The mode of feeding the axle is by the two reservoirs turning with the wheel, and the oil thus washing up; and this is the only principle upon which locomotive axles can be fed with oil without wasting it. Properly supplied with oil, a set of Collinge’s axles, as they are at present made, will run about 5,000 miles without sticking fast. The wheel is 5 feet 6 inches in diameter, which is about the height of the fore wheels of a full-sized carriage weighing about a ton. The hind wheels would, of course, run farther with the same quantity of oil. As the arms of the axles are not horizontal, but dip downwards, the bearing is principally against the shoulder, and there is consequently little strain on the nuts; and the cap, also, in this position, holds more oil. But the friction must be increased. A horizontal arm runs with much less friction than a dipping one, because the dip serves to remove a part of the weight from the hardened arm against the softer washer. With the exception of those used in railway and steam vehicles, axles are all but universally dipped, or inclined downwards at the arms. There are sundry reasons for this. First, the extra security against the wheels coming off. Secondly, the greater facility of retaining the oil; and, thirdly, the facility it gives for using dished wheels. The advantages of the dished wheels are, that while keeping the same track on the ground, the length of the axle is not increased, and greater space is afforded for the body of the vehicle; and, at the same time, the dished form is stronger than the plane. When rightly adjusted, the under spokes should be in a line exactly vertical to the base, and the upper ones form the angle. The strongest form of wheel is that in which the spokes are framed angle-wise to the nave, alternating both ways, to form a double cone, but this materially increases the length of the axle arm, and renders the nave unsightly.
The disadvantages attending “Collinge’s Patent Axle” are considerable extra weight, owing to the thickness of the box, which is usually made of cast iron. The length of the arm is also increased by reason of the collar, double nuts, and cap; and, altogether, a nave larger than ordinary is required for its insertion. But the advantages are so great, that whoever uses a vehicle with common wheels, traveling at the rate of five miles or more per hour, must be ignorant of the science of profit and loss, if he does not use them. The mere labor of keeping other axles properly greased or oiled, and the risk of abrasion from neglect, together with the waste of oil and grease, and extra risk of coming off, will make a heavy balance against the comparative cheapness in the first cost of the common axles.
The axles which I have examined bearing the name of “Charles Collinge, Lambeth,” are for the most part as well made as the best engineers’ work usually is; in short, they are as accurately finished as is necessary for any practical purpose. The only thing objectionable in them to the general purchaser, is their high price; but for a man who keeps a pleasure carriage, and is not a judge of workmanship, the wisest course is to pay that high price, and place it to the account of what Mr. Babbage has so well termed verification. Twenty-five guineas is the price, I believe, but they may be had of other makers for two-thirds of that price, some of them equally well made with those marked Charles Collinge, and some of them the merest rubbish. Without good workmanship, this axle is worse than a common one. The well-made ones are formed of thin bar-iron, welded by hand into a mass and case-hardened, both arms and boxes. After hardening, the boxes are ground on to the arms with oil and emery, consequently they cannot be perfectly true cylinders, though intended to be so. Birmingham made axles have of late, on account of their cheapness, come much in use; but unless coming from a known maker, they are not to be trusted, as, to save expense, they are commonly made from square rolled bars, good or bad, subject to flaws, sand-cracks, and cold shorts. For self-axles; i.e., axles which are bolted to two springs at the ends, and have no other bearing, as is the case with the street cabs and gigs generally, a good method would be to make the centre or bed of the axle of drawn or rolled tube; weight might be thus saved without loss of strength, and tolerable security would be taken for the goodness of the metal.
The Slower Road 